BEGIN:VCALENDAR VERSION:2.0 PRODID:-//132.216.98.100//NONSGML kigkonsult.se iCalcreator 2.20.4// BEGIN:VEVENT UID:20251120T084314EST-31775TviU3@132.216.98.100 DTSTAMP:20251120T134314Z DESCRIPTION:Yun Zhou\n\nDeGroote Scholl of Business\n McMaster University\n \nPlatform Entry and Vendor Competition in On-Demand Economy\n\nDate: Frid ay\, April 11\, 2025\n Time: 10:00 - 11:00 am\n Location: Bronfman Building\ , Room 046\n\n\nAbstract\n\nWe consider an on-demand delivery system with multiple competing vendors and examine the impact of introducing a deliver y platform on their competition. Customers have preferences for differenti ated vendors while also being sensitive to the overall cost of both the fo od price and the delivery fee. They place orders from a vendor only if the y can be delivered within a specified delivery window. Each vendor strateg ically decides whether to participate on the platform\, build its dedicate d delivery fleet (i.e.\, employing in-house delivery)\, or not offer any d elivery option (i.e.\, exclusively serving local customers as an outside o ption) to maximize its profit. Vendors who build their own dedicated deliv ery fleets decide on both the food price and delivery fee. Vendors who cho ose to participate on the platform set their food price\, while the profit -maximizing platform sets the delivery fee and takes a commission from the vendors' revenue. We solve for the system equilibrium and benchmark it ag ainst the system without the platform. Our findings indicate that the intr oduction of the platform either intensifies vendor competition\, leading t o lower vendor profits and higher individual customer surplus\, or convers ely\, alleviates vendor competition\, leading to higher vendor profits and lower individual customer surplus. The intensifying or alleviating role o f the platform on vendor competition hinges on the competitive environment of the market in which the vendors operate. We characterize conditions un der which the platform's equilibrium strategy involves subsidizing per-ord er delivery to encourage vendor participation. However\, perhaps surprisin gly\, the seemingly appealing per-order delivery subsidy (offered by the p latform to attract vendor participation) hurts vendors by encouraging them to engage in more intensified competition\, ultimately diminishing their profits. Conversely\, if the platform derives profits from per-order deliv ery\, introducing the platform alleviates vendor competition and benefits vendors. Therefore\, the platform-enabled sharing of couriers can improve delivery efficiency and lower delivery costs but may intensify vendor comp etition through per-order delivery subsidy\, placing them in a prisoner's dilemma that ultimately lowers their profits. These insights also apply to an e-commerce platform that provides storage and fulfillment services wit h economies of scale enabled by aggregating the business of sellers operat ing on the platform.\n\nAccess full paper\n DTSTART:20250411T140000Z DTEND:20250411T150000Z LOCATION:Room 046\, Bronfman Building\, CA\, QC\, Montreal\, H3A 1G5\, 1001 rue Sherbrooke Ouest SUMMARY:Management Science Research Centre (MSRC) Seminar: Yun Zhou URL:/desautels/channels/event/management-science-resea rch-centre-msrc-seminar-yun-zhou-364887 END:VEVENT END:VCALENDAR