ɬ﷬

Subscribe to the OSS Weekly Newsletter!

Ultrasound During Pregnancy: Sound Advice or Sound the Alarm?

Pregnancy comes with enough worries—your ultrasound shouldn't be one of them. We unpack the science, address the concerns, and explain why the real risk might be listening to the wrong people.

Let’s be honest—pregnancy is basically a nine-month exercise in overthinking. Is that sushi safe? Should I be sleeping on my left side? And what, exactly, is in prenatal vitamins anyway? Somewhere on that ever-expanding list sits the ultrasound: a routine, widely used tool that some corners of the internet have started side-eyeing with suspicion.

In this article, we’re turning down the noise and turning up the facts. We’ll break down why ultrasounds are used, what science says about their safety, and why your best source of information still isn’t your friend’s cousin’s doula’s wellness blog.

Why Ultrasounds Are a Pregnancy Staple

Ultrasounds are more than just your baby’s first photo op (although, let’s admit it—that blurry little blob is adorable). These scans give healthcare providers vital info, including:

  • Estimating your due date based on fetal measurements.
  • Checking for ectopic pregnancies, where the embryo implants outside the uterus.
  • Monitoring fetal heart rate, growth, and movement.
  • Spotting placenta previa, where the placenta covers the cervix (not ideal for delivery).
  • Determining the baby’s sex, if you want to know—and if the baby feels like cooperating.

In short, ultrasounds aren’t just routine—they’re revelatory.

But... Is It Safe?

Here’s where things get noisy. The internet is buzzing with fears about “ultrasound heating,” especially around Doppler ultrasound, which uses continuous sound waves to measure blood flow.

Yes, it’s true that ultrasound waves can be absorbed by tissue and converted into heat—and Doppler ultrasound, which is used to assess blood flow, is particularly noteworthy here. Unlike routine B-mode scans that use short, pulsed sound waves, Doppler uses continuous or high repetition rate signals, delivering more energy to a single spot. This makes it more likely to generate heat, especially later in pregnancy when fetal bone tissue—which is excellent at absorbing sound energy—can transfer that heat to nearby brain tissue. pointed out that up to 75% of this heating can happen within the first 30 seconds of exposure near bone, and that the fetal skull’s development increases sensitivity to this effect. However, it’s important to note that all of the studies discussed in that paper were conducted on animal models, including sheep, guinea pig fetuses, and neonatal pigs—not humans. Moreover, these findings came from controlled experimental conditions using exposure times and intensities much longer and higher than what is used in standard obstetric practice. Nevertheless, given the findings of this review, and others, Doppler ultrasound is scrutinized more closely for potential thermal effects than standard imaging.

The World Federation for Ultrasound in Medicine and Biology (WFUMB) , stating that:

“Biologically significant temperature increases have been measured, at or near bone/soft tissue interfaces, during exposure to conditions similar to those used in Doppler diagnostic equipment. The effects of elevated temperatures may be minimised by keeping the time for which the beam passes through any one point in tissue as short as possible.”

In clinical practice, this is exactly what trained sonographers and physicians do—they move the probe, limit exposure time, and use the lowest settings necessary to get the needed information. As long as Doppler techniques are used judiciously and briefly, the actual risk remains theoretical, not proven.

Then Why the Fuss?

Since 1992, the maximum intensity for diagnostic ultrasound in the U.S. has quietly increased over sevenfold, from 94 to 720 mW/cm². What we 󲹱’t seen since? Large-scale, population-based studies evaluating whether these higher levels pose new risks. So, the concern isn’t totally unfounded—it’s just not backed by any evidence of harm so far.

Medical societies know this. That’s why regulatory agencies require real-time output display standards—think of them as ultrasound “speedometers”—so clinicians can stay within safe operating zones.

TL;DR: Ultrasounds Are (Still) Safe—When Used Wisely

Despite higher machine outputs today, expert bodies consistently affirm that the benefits of diagnostic ultrasound outweigh the theoretical risks when performed by trained professionals. That means if you’re pregnant and wondering whether to get that scan, your best bet is simple:

Ask your doctor—not your favourite wellness influencer or your friend’s naturopath who thinks kale juice is a cure-all.


‌SDZ󾱱ղԲʱ

Sophie Tseng Pellar recently graduated from ɬ﷬ with a Bachelor of Science (BSc) degree in the physiology program. She will be continuing her graduate studies in the surgical and interventional sciences program at ɬ﷬. Her research interests include exercise physiology, biomechanics and sports nutrition.

Part of the OSS mandate is to foster science communication and critical thinking in our students and the public. We hope you enjoy these pieces from our Student Contributors and welcome any feedback you may have!

Back to top