ɬŔď·¬

ɬŔď·¬ Ethics Bowl: Where Civil Discourse and Intellectual Courage Meet

On Saturday February 21st and Sunday February 22nd, ɬŔď·¬ hosted its annual Quebec Ethics Bowl, a debate tournament for secondary students. A total of 21 teams came to ɬŔ﷬ over the two days to debate complex topics like friendship and AI, life sentences, the limits of free speech, the ethics of weightloss medication, and more. Students enthusiastically argued their stances on these moral issues while they were scored by judges on their ability to form a logical and rigorous argument.

At the Ethics Bowl, judges don’t care how many multisyllabic words you know, or how good you are at destroying your opponents, instead teams are scored on whether or not they have listened to what their opponent actually has to say, and are arguing for what they believe is right. In this way, the Ethics Bowl differs significantly from typical debate; teams aren’t assigned a “for” or “against” stance on the topics in question, instead they are free to argue for what they actually believe, and are encouraged to take intellectual risk. For this reason, the Ethics Bowl is an event that is working to encourage civil discourse in our debates, and intellectual courage in our students. 

Three years ago, ɬŔď·¬ hosted Quebec’s first ever Ethics Bowl, and was also the first institution to hold both a French and English competition. It was small, with only five French teams and four English teams participating. The next year, we doubled our numbers. This year, as we hosted the third annual Quebec Ethics Bowl, we had the largest number of participating teams yet. Our competitors were schools that had been with us from the beginning, and schools trying their hand at Ethics Bowling for the first time. There were private schools and public schools, secondary schools and CEGEPs. On the volunteering end we had 10 organizers who volunteer year-round (some of whom have been with us for the past 3 years), on the weekend of the event we had 4 scorekeepers, 10 moderators, and a whopping 35 judges. Our moderators were undergraduate students who gave us their Saturday or Sunday (and for some of them their entire weekend) during midterm season with nothing but the promise of free pizza and the chance to be a part of an event that may leave them feeling better about the world. Our judges were a combination of upper-level undergraduate students, masters students, PhD candidates, and community members. 

Having been the organizer of this event at ɬŔď·¬ for the past three years, I have gotten the incredible opportunity to know many of the wonderful teachers who coach their students in this event, along with some students who keep coming back year after year. One teacher (Robin Vero from Laurentian Regional High School) told me that helping her students prepare for this event has made her a better teacher, and we had one student who brought the Ethics Bowl to her CEGEP so that she could keep competing at our event. I am so proud of all our students who participated in this year’s event, whether they be the CEGEP team that has years of Ethics Bowl experience or the Sec III/Grade 9 students trying their hand at it for the first time. Seeing teams show up in matching t-shirts with their team names on them (my favourite being “The Moral Monkeys”), or hearing students doing their team cheer before every match are the moments that make running this event truly a labour of love. 

On that note, while this event is mostly about the students and their teachers, a lot of incredible people from the ɬŔď·¬ community poured a lot of effort into this event. Firstly, I must recognize that this event wouldn’t be possible without the Faculty of Arts and the Desautels Faculty of Management. More specifically, thanks to the Philosophy department for organizing the event and the Laidley Centre of Business Ethics and Equity for being our primary sponsors. On an individual level, our Dean of Arts Dr. Lisa Shapiro deserves all the credit for being the person to bring the Ethics Bowl to ɬŔď·¬ and by extension Quebec in the first place. Additional thanks goes to Dr. Lindsay Holmgren from the Laidley Centre and Dr. Ian Gold from the Philosophy Department. While all our judges and moderators are absolutely incredible and deserve individual shoutouts, their names are too many to list, so I will instead highlight just four: thanks to community members Jeff Baikowitz, Stefan Fews, and Gregg Blachford for judging with us this year, and special thanks to Roxeanne Guay who gave us her entire weekend at the last minute after another moderator dropped out. Finally, last but not least thank you to the Philosophy Student Association for their continued support, along with my entire organizing team.  

Special shoutouts to Yi Xi Huang for being our day-of francophone organizer, Sophie Dugas for being our main french coordinator, Minji Jeong and Vincent BĂ©langer for being consistently amazing, Uday Bhardwaj for being willing to do whatever was needed of him during the event, and finally to Hazel Krauth and Sasha Vilkof for running around with me all weekend. The ɬŔď·¬ community is truly incredible and is the reason the Ethics Bowl will return to ɬŔď·¬ next year, and many years after that.

Back to top